In order to have a better understanding of the controversy over the
introduction of individual cups into worship we reprint the following:
McGarvey writes on -
Those Individual Cups
The fresh and verdant fad of the individual communion cups, which is all
the rage now with church members who care more for "keeping up with the
precession" than for following the example of our Lord, has received a
black eye recently from two sources. A Methodist bishop has refused to
use them when brought forward where he was to officiate, and the General
Conference of the Methodist Church, North, has forbidden the use of them
to churches. See the clipping below which we take from the Western
Recorder:
"Recently in the meeting of the New Hampshire Conference, Bishop
Faster, of the Methodist Church, refused to have the communion
administered in the individual communion cups which had been brought
forth. He refused to consider the innovation on the custom of the
churches from the days of the Lord to the present time a matter of
indifference. The Methodist General Conference voted down
overwhelmingly a motion to allow the use of the individual communion
cups in their churches."
Whatever may be the special pleading in excuse for this innovation, it
is perfectly clear that it aims to avoid that which the Lord enjoined in
instituting the Supper; that is, the use of the same cup by a number of
individuals. He could have directed each of the twelve to drink from his
own cup, had he adjudged that to be the better way. But he did not, and
we shall be far more likely to please him by doing what he did than by
doing what he avoided. If it is wrong to change in the slightest degree
the ordinance of baptism, it is still worse, if possible, to change the
ordinance of the Lord's Supper. Do you plead the danger of contracting
disease? Then you adopt a plan which you have indignantly rejected when
it is applied to immersion. The legs of the lame are not equal.
From Biblical Criticism Conducted by J. W. McGarvey
Christian Standard, June 25, 1904.